Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38986575›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood2024

Exploring communication preferences and risk thresholds of clinicians and parents of febrile infants under 90 days presenting to the emergency department: a qualitative study.

Kathryn Wilson, Etimbuk Umana, David McCleary, Thomas Waterfield, Kerry Woolfall

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05259683 (Validating Clinical Decision Aids for the Assessment and Management of Febrile Infants Presenting to Emergency Care in the UK and Ireland.), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05259683 completednot on this map

Validating Clinical Decision Aids for the Assessment and Management of Febrile Infants Presenting to Emergency Care in the UK and Ireland.

TypeobservationalSponsorQueen's University, BelfastRan2022 to 2023Enrolled2,076ConditionsUrinary Tract Infections, Meningitis, Sepsis, Bacterial Infections
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kathryn WilsonWellcome Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Belfast, UK kath_wilson@icloud.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3106-3971
Etimbuk UmanaWellcome Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Belfast, UK.
David McClearyWellcome Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Belfast, UK.
Thomas WaterfieldWellcome Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Belfast, UK.
Kerry WoolfallUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFebrile infants under 3 months of age are at higher risk of invasive bacterial illness (IBI) when compared with older children. Increasingly sequential assessment based on age, clinical appearance and biomarkers is used to determine the risk of IBI, and appropriateness of invasive procedures such as lumbar puncture. The purpose of this qualitative study is to report parents and clinicians' opinions on communication of risks and benefits of sequential assessment and tailored treatment.

methods18 parents enrolled in the Febrile Infant Diagnostic Assessment and Outcomes study and seven clinicians from England, Wales and Northern Ireland were purposively selected to participate in virtual qualitative interviews. Data were analysed thematically.

resultsTailored treatment plans were widely supported. Confidence in the clinician was central to parents' attitude towards management recommendations. Parents' decision-making preferences change throughout their child's clinical journey, with an initial preference for clinician-led decisions evolving towards collaborative decision-making as their stress and anxiety reduce. There were widespread differences in preferences for how risk was discussed. Parents self-reported poor retention of information and felt communication adjuncts helped their understanding. Clinicians were generally positive about the use of clinical decision aids as a communication tool, rather than relying on them for decision-making. DISCUSSION: Parents want to feel informed, but their desire to be involved in shared decision-making evolves over time.Clinicians appear to use their clinical judgement to provide individualised information, evolving their communication in response to perceived parental needs.Poor information retention highlights the need for repetition of information and use of communication adjuncts. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05259683.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalFeverParentsQualitative ResearchAttitude of Health PersonnelBacterial InfectionsCommunicationDecision MakingFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleProfessional-Family RelationsRisk AssessmentEmergency CareHealth services researchPaediatric Emergency MedicineQualitative researchSepsis

Identifiers

PMID38986575
PMCPMC11503189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.