Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38986553›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Psychosocial outcomes following emergency laparotomy (POLO) study: a study protocol for a multicentre mixed-methods prospective cohort study assessing the psycho-social outcomes following emergency laparotomy in adults.

Louise Silva, Sarah Abbas Mohamed, Alun Meggy, Jene Hwei Ng, Jared Torkington, Susan Moug, Tessa Watts, Jonathan Bisson, Julie A Cornish

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05281627 (Psycho-Social Outcomes Following Emergency Laparotomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05281627 unknown statusnot on this map

Psycho-Social Outcomes Following Emergency Laparotomy

TypeobservationalSponsorCardiff and Vale University Health BoardRan2021 to 2024Enrolled175ConditionsEmergency LaparotomyArmsEmergency Laparotomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Louise SilvaDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK silval2@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9858-8011
Sarah Abbas MohamedDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Alun MeggyResearch and Development, Cardiff and Vale University Hospital, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9031-7516
Jene Hwei NgRoyal Alexandra Hospital, Paisley, UK.
Jared TorkingtonDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3218-0574
Susan MougRoyal Alexandra Hospital, Paisley, UK.
Tessa WattsSchool of Health Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1201-5192
Jonathan BissonPsychological Medicine and Clinical Neuroscience, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5170-1243
Julie A CornishDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4360-4472

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMorbidity from an emergency laparotomy (EmLap) is difficult to define and poorly understood. Morbidity is a holistic concept, reliant upon an interplay of bio-psychosocial outcomes that evolve long after discharge. To date, no previous study has explored the psychosocial outcomes following EmLap as a collective, nor their change over time. This study aims to describe the holistic morbidity following EmLap within the first year following surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, mixed-methods prospective 12-month cohort study with two participant populations: patient participants and family caregivers (FCGs). A target of 160 adult patients who undergo EmLap and can give informed consent will be included in the patient participant group. Patient participants will be asked to complete three patient surveys, incorporating validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to assess bio-psychosocial outcomes (EuroQol five-dimension five-level (EQ5D-5L), Gastrointestinal Quality Life Index-36, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7, International Trauma Questionnaire, Caregiver Interaction Scale and Fatigue Severity Scale) in the 12 months following surgery. A subgroup of 15 patient participants will be asked to take part in two semistructured interviews at 6 and 12 months. A target of 15 associated family caregivers will be included in the FCG group. FCGs will be asked to take part in a semi-structured interview at 6 months to assess the EmLap impact on the wider support network. The primary outcome will be a change in quality of life (EQ5D-5L) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes will be changes in bio-psychosocial status at 3 and 12 months. Qualitative analysis will allow contextualisation of PROMS and further explore themes of EmLap morbidity. It is anticipated that the results of this study will help inform and develop standards of aftercare for future EmLap patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received ethical approval (Wales REC7;12/WA/0297) and will be undertaken in accordance with the principles of Good Clinical Practice. We intend to disseminate study results in peer-reviewed journals and medical conferences, as well as a lay report to study participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical Trials.gov NCT05281627.

Indexed as

LaparotomyQuality of LifeAdultCaregiversEmergenciesFemaleHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesAdult surgeryColorectal surgeryHepatobiliary surgerySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID38986553
PMCPMC11268063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.