Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38986134›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2024

Usability and Preliminary Efficacy of an Adaptive Supportive Care System for Patients With Cancer: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Sharon H Baik, Karen Clark, Marisol Sanchez, Matthew Loscalzo, Ashley Celis, Marianne Razavi, Dershung Yang, William Dale, Niina Haas

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02408406 (PatientCareAnywhere), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02408406 nacompletednot on this map

PatientCareAnywhere: Patient Support and Empowerment Across the Care Continuum

TypeinterventionalSponsorCity of Hope Medical CenterRan2015 to 2024Enrolled140ConditionsBladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma, Colorectal Carcinoma, Lung CarcinomaArmsCommunication Intervention, Educational Intervention, Internet-Based Intervention, Quality-of-Life Assessment, Questionnaire Administration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Models, outcomes, barriers, and facilitators of supportive care in cancer: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Triage tools to inform the prioritisation of physical health services following a diagnosis of cancer: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sharon H BaikDepartment of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3565-754X
Karen ClarkDepartment of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8134-5013
Marisol SanchezDepartment of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1798-5535
Matthew LoscalzoDepartment of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2185-7241
Ashley CelisDepartment of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7350-8882
Marianne RazaviDepartment of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1070-3848
Dershung YangBrightOutcome, Buffalo Grove, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4566-377X
William DaleDepartment of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8674-9394
Niina HaasBrightOutcome, Buffalo Grove, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8512-9679

Funding

PatientCareAnywhere: Patient Support and Empowerment Across the Care ContinuumR44CA192588 · NCI · BRIGHTOUTCOME INC. · PI HAAS, NIINA M., YANG, DERSHUNG · 2015 to 2018
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R44 CA192588
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsing an iterative user-centered design process, our team developed a patient-centered adaptive supportive care system, PatientCareAnywhere, that provides comprehensive biopsychosocial screening and supportive cancer care to patients across the continuum of care adaptively. The overarching goal of PatientCareAnywhere is to improve health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and self-efficacy of patients with cancer by empowering them with self-management skills and bringing cancer care support directly to them at home. Such support is adaptive to the patient's needs and health status and coordinated across multiple sources in the forms of referrals, education, engagement of community resources, and secure social communication.

objectiveThis study aims to assess the usability of the new web-based PatientCareAnywhere system and examine the preliminary efficacy of PatientCareAnywhere to improve patient-reported outcomes compared with usual care.

methodsFor phase 1, usability testing participants included patients with cancer (n=4) and caregivers (n=7) who evaluated the software prototype and provided qualitative (eg, interviews) and quantitative (eg, System Usability Scale) feedback. For phase 2, participants in the 3-month pilot randomized controlled trial were randomized to receive the PatientCareAnywhere intervention (n=36) or usual care control condition (n=36). HRQOL and cancer-relevant self-efficacy were assessed at baseline (preintervention assessment) and 12 weeks from baseline (postintervention assessment); mean differences between pre- and postintervention scores were compared between the 2 groups.

resultsParticipants were highly satisfied with the prototype and reported above-average acceptable usability, with a mean System Usability Scale score of 84.09 (SD 10.02). Qualitative data supported the overall usability and perceived usefulness of the intervention, with a few design features (eg, "help request" function) added based on participant feedback. With regard to the randomized controlled trial, patients in the intervention group reported significant improvements in HRQOL from pre- to postintervention scores (mean difference 6.08, SD 15.26) compared with the control group (mean difference -2.95, SD 10.63; P=.01). In contrast, there was no significant between-group difference in self-efficacy (P=.09).

conclusionsOverall, PatientCareAnywhere represents a user-friendly, functional, and acceptable supportive care intervention with preliminary efficacy to improve HRQOL among patients diagnosed with cancer. Future studies are needed to further establish the efficacy of PatientCareAnywhere as well as explore strategies to enhance user engagement and investigate the optimal intensity, frequency, and use of the intervention to improve patient outcomes.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02408406; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02408406.

Indexed as

cancerdistress screeningeHealthmobile phonesupportive care

Identifiers

PMID38986134
PMCPMC11269963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.