ArticleJCO oncology practice2024
Two-to-One Randomization: Rarely Advisable.
Article in JCO oncology practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapy for platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory recurrent ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Oral Administration of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum KBL396 Regulates Serum 5-Hydroxytryptamine and Gut Microbiota: Evidence from a Preclinical Mouse Model and a Randomized Controlled Human Trial.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Automated EEG-Based Brainwave Analysis for the Detection of Postoperative Delirium Does Not Result in a Shorter Length of Stay in Geriatric Hip Fracture Patients: A Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In a randomized clinical trial, instead of allocating patients equally between the treatment arms, some trials in oncology assign a higher proportion of patients to receive the experimental treatment arm (eg, a two-to-one randomization). In this commentary, we first briefly review the common reasons given for the use of a two-to-one randomization and provide some examples of trials using these designs. We then explain why the risk-benefit ratio of this approach may not be favorable as is commonly assumed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.