ArticlePloS one2024
Reduced adaptability to balance perturbations in older adults with probable cognitive impairment after a severe fall.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Joint associations of physical activity and sleep duration with falls: evidence from the China health and retirement longitudinal study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Tailored interventions to prevent functional decline after a Sentinel Fall presenting to the Emergency Department (iSeFallED) - protocol for a pragmatic mixed-methods implementation study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- How socioeconomic status shapes health outcomes following severe falls: a cross-sectional analysis.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Reliability of the adapted compensatory arm and leg movements scale during perturbation treadmill walking in older adults.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- Age-Related Changes in Postural Stability in Response to Varying Surface Instability in Young and Middle-Aged Adults.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Falls in older individuals often result from unexpected balance disturbances during walking, necessitating the analysis of recovery strategies for effective falls prevention. This becomes particularly crucial for individuals with cognitive impairment, who face a higher fall risk compared to cognitively healthy adults. Hence, our study aimed to compare the recovery response to standardized walking perturbations on a treadmill between older adults with cognitive impairment and cognitively healthy older adults. 36 individuals with a recent history of a severe fall, leading to an emergency department visit without subsequent admission, were stratified into two groups (with and without probable cognitive impairment) based on scores of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Recovery performance was quantified using force plate data from a perturbation treadmill (M-Gait, Motek Medical B.V., Amsterdam, the Netherlands), specifically evaluating the number of steps needed to restore step length and width to pre perturbation baseline across two trials of nine different perturbations. Individuals with cognitive impairment (n = 18, mean age: 74.7) required significantly (p = 0.045, Cohen's d = 0.69) more steps to recover total steps after perturbations compared to cognitively healthy individuals (n = 18, mean age: 69.7). While step width recovery was similar between the groups, those with probable cognitive impairment required significantly more steps to recover their step length (p = 0.039, Cohen's d = 0.72). Thus, our findings indicate that older adults with probable cognitive impairment manifest inferior gait adaptability, especially in adapting step length, potentially underscoring a critical aspect for effective falls prevention in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.