Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38985774›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

A supervised multiclass framework for mineral classification of Iberian beads.

Daniel Sanchez-Gomez, Carlos P Odriozola Lloret, Ana Catarina Sousa, José Ángel Garrido-Cordero, Galo Romero-García, José María Martínez-Blanes, Manel Edo I Benaiges, Rodrigo Villalobos-García, Victor S Gonçalves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel Sanchez-GomezCentro de Arqueologia da Universidade de Lisboa (UNIARQ), Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3179-3288
Carlos P Odriozola LloretCentro de Arqueologia da Universidade de Lisboa (UNIARQ), Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana Catarina SousaCentro de Arqueologia da Universidade de Lisboa (UNIARQ), Lisbon, Portugal.
José Ángel Garrido-CorderoDpto. de Prehistoria y Arqueología, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9585-7917
Galo Romero-GarcíaDpto. de Prehistoria y Arqueología, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1533-5781
José María Martínez-BlanesInstituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Sevilla, Universidad de Sevilla- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Seville, Spain.
Manel Edo I BenaigesInstitut d'Arqueologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Rodrigo Villalobos-GarcíaCuerpo de Profesores de Enseñanza Secundaria, Gobierno de Cantabria, Cantabria, Spain.
Victor S GonçalvesCentro de Arqueologia da Universidade de Lisboa (UNIARQ), Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on personal adornments depends on the reliable characterisation of materials to trace provenance and model complex social networks. However, many analytical techniques require the transfer of materials from the museum to the laboratory, involving high insurance costs and limiting the number of items that can be analysed, making the process of empirical data collection a complicated, expensive and time-consuming routine. In this study, we compiled the largest geochemical dataset of Iberian personal adornments (n = 1243 samples) by coupling X-ray fluorescence compositional data with their respective X-ray diffraction mineral labels. This allowed us to develop a machine learning-based framework for the prediction of bead-forming minerals by training and benchmarking 13 of the most widely used supervised algorithms. As a proof of concept, we developed a multiclass model and evaluated its performance on two assemblages from different Portuguese sites with current mineralogical characterisation: Cova das Lapas (n = 15 samples) and Gruta da Marmota (n = 10 samples). Our results showed that decisión-tres based classifiers outperformed other classification logics given the discriminative importance of some chemical elements in determining the mineral phase, which fits particularly well with the decision-making process of this type of model. The comparison of results between the different validation sets and the proof-of-concept has highlighted the risk of using synthetic data to handle imbalance and the main limitation of the framework: its restrictive class system. We conclude that the presented approach can successfully assist in the mineral classification workflow when specific analyses are not available, saving time and allowing a transparent and straightforward assessment of model predictions. Furthermore, we propose a workflow for the interpretation of predictions using the model outputs as compound responses enabling an uncertainty reduction approach currently used by our team. The Python-based framework is packaged in a public repository and includes all the necessary resources for its reusability without the need for any installation.

Indexed as

MineralsAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningPortugalSpectrometry, X-Ray EmissionSupervised Machine LearningX-Ray DiffractionMinerals

Identifiers

PMID38985774
PMCPMC11236108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.