Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38985740›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Impact of terminal cleaning in rooms previously occupied by patients with healthcare-associated infections.

Marc Verhougstraete, Emily Cooksey, Jennifer-Pearce Walker, Amanda M Wilson, Madeline S Lewis, Aaron Yoder, Gabriela Elizondo-Craig, Munthir Almoslem, Emily Forysiak, Mark H Weir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marc VerhougstraeteMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4154-7531
Emily CookseyMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona United States of America.
Jennifer-Pearce WalkerMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona United States of America.
Amanda M WilsonMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona United States of America.
Madeline S LewisSustainability Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Aaron YoderMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona United States of America.
Gabriela Elizondo-CraigMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona United States of America.
Munthir AlmoslemMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona United States of America.
Emily ForysiakMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona United States of America.
Mark H WeirMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare associated infections (HAIs) are costly but preventable. A limited understanding of the effects of environmental cleaning on the riskiest HAI associated pathogens is a current challenge in HAI prevention. This project aimed to quantify the effects of terminal hospital cleaning practices on HAI pathogens via environmental sampling in three hospitals located throughout the United States. Surfaces were swabbed from 36 occupied patient rooms with a laboratory-confirmed, hospital- or community-acquired infection of at least one of the four pathogens of interest (i.e., Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii), methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecalis/faecium (VRE), and Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile)). Six nonporous, high touch surfaces (i.e., chair handrail, bed handrail, nurse call button, desk surface, bathroom counter near the sink, and a grab bar near the toilet) were sampled in each room for Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP) and the four pathogens of interest before and after terminal cleaning. The four pathogens of interest were detected on surfaces before and after terminal cleaning, but their levels were generally reduced. Overall, C. difficile was confirmed on the desk (n = 2), while MRSA (n = 24) and VRE (n = 25) were confirmed on all surface types before terminal cleaning. After cleaning, only MRSA (n = 6) on bed handrail, chair handrail, and nurse call button and VRE (n = 5) on bathroom sink, bed handrail, nurse call button, toilet grab bar, and C. difficile (n = 1) were confirmed. At 2 of the 3 hospitals, pathogens were generally reduced by >99% during terminal cleaning. One hospital showed that VRE increased after terminal cleaning, MRSA was reduced by 73% on the nurse call button, and VRE was reduced by only 50% on the bathroom sink. ATP detections did not correlate with any pathogen concentration. This study highlights the importance of terminal cleaning and indicates room for improvement in cleaning practices to reduce surface contamination throughout hospital rooms.

Indexed as

Clostridioides difficileCross InfectionMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusPatients' RoomsAcinetobacter baumanniiHousekeeping, HospitalHumansInfection ControlVancomycin-Resistant Enterococci

Identifiers

PMID38985740
PMCPMC11236128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.