Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38985733›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Navigating vaccination choices: The intersecting dynamics of institutional trust, belonging and message perception among Congolese migrants in London, UK (a reflexive thematic analysis).

Alison F Crawshaw, Tushna Vandrevala, Felicity Knights, Anna Deal, Laura Muzinga Lutumba, Sarah Nkembi, Lusau Mimi Kitoko, Caroline Hickey, Alice S Forster, Sally Hargreaves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alison F CrawshawInstitute for Infection and Immunity, The Migrant Health Research Group, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0450-7258
Tushna VandrevalaFaculty of Health, Science, Social Care and Education, Centre for Applied Health and Social Care Research, Kingston University London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1140-8445
Felicity KnightsInstitute for Infection and Immunity, The Migrant Health Research Group, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, United Kingdom.
Anna DealInstitute for Infection and Immunity, The Migrant Health Research Group, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, United Kingdom.
Laura Muzinga LutumbaHackney Congolese Women Support Group, c/o Hackney CVS, The Adiaha Antigha Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Sarah NkembiHackney Congolese Women Support Group, c/o Hackney CVS, The Adiaha Antigha Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Lusau Mimi KitokoHackney Congolese Women Support Group, c/o Hackney CVS, The Adiaha Antigha Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Caroline HickeyHackney Refugee and Migrant Forum and Hackney CVS, The Adiaha Antigha Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Alice S ForsterOur Future Health, New Bailey, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Sally HargreavesInstitute for Infection and Immunity, The Migrant Health Research Group, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2974-4348

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately impacted intersectionally marginalised migrants, revealing systemic disparities in health outcomes and vaccine uptake. Understanding the underlying social and structural factors influencing health behaviours is necessary to develop tailored interventions for migrants, but these factors have been seldom explored. This qualitative study aimed to explore contextual factors shaping COVID-19 vaccination decision-making among Congolese migrants in the UK.A community-based participatory research study was designed and led by a community-academic partnership in London, UK (2021-2022). Peer-led, semi-structured interviews were conducted in Lingala with 32 adult Congolese migrants and explored beliefs, perceptions and lived experiences of migration, healthcare, vaccination and the COVID-19 pandemic. Reflexive thematic analysis generated two themes and a model conceptualising the vaccination decision-making process. Participants and community partners were financially compensated; ethics was granted by the University of London ethics committee (REC: 2021.0128).Participants highlighted the incompatibility of lockdown restrictions with their communal culture, which intensified feelings of exclusion and alienation. Concerns about COVID-19 vaccination were attributed to safety and effectiveness, partly informed by experiences and legacies of racial discrimination and exploitation. Inequality in the pandemic response and COVID-19 outcomes heightened participants' sense that their views and needs were being overlooked, and government sources and information were perceived as coercive. Our model depicts the interplay between institutional trust, belonging, and message perception, which shaped participants' vaccination decisions and led to (non-)engagement with COVID-19 vaccination. This research enhances understanding of how social and contextual factors may influence migrants' engagement with health interventions. It underscores the importance of partnering with migrant communities to understand their needs in context and co-design tailored interventions and inclusive messaging strategies that promote trust and belonging. Implementing systemic changes to address structural inequalities will be crucial to create an environment that supports engagement with health-protective behaviours and enhances health outcomes among migrant communities.

Identifiers

PMID38985733
PMCPMC11236099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.