Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38985697›Full record

ReviewMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2024

Isolated Calf Muscle Venous Thrombosis: A Review of Anticoagulation Strategies.

Chang Liu, Chen Qi, Weijia Chen, Qingqing Dai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Calf Muscle Vein Thrombosis After Hip and Lower-Limb Fracture Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chang LiuDepartment of Geriatrics, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Chen QiDepartment of Geriatrics, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Weijia ChenDepartment of Geriatrics, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Qingqing DaiDepartment of Geriatrics, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremities is divided into 2 categories according to the extent of thrombosis involvement. Thrombosis involving the popliteal vein, femoral vein, and iliac vein is classified as proximal DVT, while thrombosis involving the anterior tibial vein, posterior tibial vein, peroneal vein, and calf muscles vein is regarded as distal DVT. There are updated guidelines for the anticoagulant treatment for proximal DVT, but the best anticoagulant treatment for distal DVT is still controversial, especially for isolated calf muscular vein thrombosis (CMVT). The risk of isolated CMVT extending to the proximal deep veins and developing into pulmonary embolism is lower than with distal DVT. Some scholars believe that isolated CMVT has the risk of evolving into proximal deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and active early anticoagulation therapy can reduce the risk and benefit patients. In addition, based on the characteristics of CMVT and the bleeding risk of anticoagulation therapy, some studies have recommended use of non-anticoagulation methods such as compression therapy. There is still a lack of multicenter, big-data, randomized, controlled trials on the benefits or risks of anticoagulation therapy. Among scholars who support anticoagulation therapy, there is still a lack of consensus on the optimal duration. This article reviews the current evidence on anticoagulant therapy for patients with isolated CMVT and how long the anticoagulation course should be if anticoagulation is required. Our research will provide a theoretical basis for subsequent research. More prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed to provide more clinical evidence.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsLegVenous ThrombosisHumansMuscle, SkeletalPulmonary EmbolismAnticoagulants

Identifiers

PMID38985697
PMCPMC11302239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.