Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38985474›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2024

Feedback and Financial Incentives for Reducing Cell Phone Use While Driving: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

M Kit Delgado, Jeffrey P Ebert, Ruiying A Xiong, Flaura K Winston, Catherine C McDonald, Roy M Rosin, Kevin G Volpp, Ian J Barnett, Dylan S Small, Douglas J Wiebe and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03833219 (Comparative Effectiveness of Financial Incentives and Smartphone-based Nudges to Reduce Cellphone Use While Driving Among Auto Insurance Policy Holders With Usage Based Insurance Policies), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03833219 nacompletednot on this map

Comparative Effectiveness of Financial Incentives and Smartphone-based Nudges to Reduce Cellphone Use While Driving Among Auto Insurance Policy Holders With Usage Based Insurance Policies

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2019 to 2020Enrolled2,108ConditionsAutomobile AccidentArmsWeekly feedback, End of intervention period incentive, Loss-framed weekly incentive
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

M Kit DelgadoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Jeffrey P EbertDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Ruiying A XiongPenn Medicine Nudge Unit, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Flaura K WinstonCenter for Injury Research and Prevention, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia.
Catherine C McDonaldPenn Injury Science Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Roy M RosinPenn Medicine Nudge Unit, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Kevin G VolppPenn Medicine Nudge Unit, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ian J BarnettDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Dylan S SmallDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Douglas J WiebeDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Dina Abdel-RahmanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Jessica E HemmonsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Rafi FinegoldTrueMotion Inc (acquired by Cambridge Mobile Telematics), Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Benjamin KotrcTrueMotion Inc (acquired by Cambridge Mobile Telematics), Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Emma RadfordTrueMotion Inc (acquired by Cambridge Mobile Telematics), Cambridge, Massachusetts.
William J FisherThe Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Mayfield Village, Ohio.
Kristen L GabaThe Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Mayfield Village, Ohio.
William C EverettThe Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Mayfield Village, Ohio.
Scott D HalpernDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Funding

Reducing Risky Teen Cellphone Use While Driving Using Behavioral Economics, Technology, and EpidemiologyK23HD090272 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DELGADO, MUCIO · 2017 to 2020
$675k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD090272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Handheld phone use while driving is a major factor in vehicle crashes. Scalable interventions are needed to encourage drivers not to use their phones. Objective: To test whether interventions involving social comparison feedback and/or financial incentives can reduce drivers' handheld phone use. Design, Setting, and Participants: In a randomized clinical trial, interventions were administered nationwide in the US via a mobile application in the context of a usage-based insurance program (Snapshot Mobile application). Customers were eligible to be invited to participate in the study if enrolled in the usage-based insurance program for 30 to 70 days. The study was conducted from May 13 to June 30, 2019. Analysis was completed December 22, 2023. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 6 trial arms for a 7-week intervention period: (1) control; (2) feedback, with weekly push notification about their handheld phone use compared with that of similar others; (3) standard incentive, with a maximum $50 award at the end of the intervention based on how their handheld phone use compared with similar others; (4) standard incentive plus feedback, combining interventions of arms 2 and 3; (5) reframed incentive plus feedback, with a maximum $7.15 award each week, framed as participant's to lose; and (6) doubled reframed incentive plus feedback, a maximum $14.29 weekly loss-framed award. Main Outcome and Measure: Proportion of drive time engaged in handheld phone use in seconds per hour (s/h) of driving. Analyses were conducted with the intention-to-treat approach. Results: Of 17 663 customers invited by email to participate, 2109 opted in and were randomized. A total of 2020 drivers finished the intervention period (68.0% female; median age, 30 [IQR, 25-39] years). Median baseline handheld phone use was 216 (IQR, 72-480) s/h. Relative to control, feedback and standard incentive participants did not reduce their handheld phone use. Standard incentive plus feedback participants reduced their use by -38 (95% CI, -69 to -8) s/h (P = .045); reframed incentive plus feedback participants reduced their use by -56 (95% CI, -87 to -26) s/h (P < .001); and doubled reframed incentive plus feedback participants reduced their use by -42 s/h (95% CI, -72 to -13 s/h; P = .007). The 5 active treatment arms did not differ significantly from each other. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, providing social comparison feedback plus incentives reduced handheld phone use while individuals were driving. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03833219.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingMotivationAdultCell Phone UseFeedbackFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMobile ApplicationsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID38985474
PMCPMC11238027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.