Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38985451›Full record

ReviewFuture cardiology2024

Mitral valve replacement in young patients: review and current challenges.

Fadi Hage, Ali Hage, Manuel R Cervetti, Michael W A Chu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Future cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fadi HageDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
Ali HageDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
Manuel R CervettiDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
Michael W A ChuDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitral valve repair is the ideal intervention for mitral valve disease with excellent long-term survival comparable to the age-matched general population. When the mitral valve is not repairable, mechanical prostheses may be associated with improved survival as compared with biological prostheses. Newer mechanical and biological valve prostheses have the potential to improve outcomes following mitral valve replacement in young patients. Patients presenting for mitral valve surgery after failed transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve have high rates of postoperative mortality and morbidity, exceeding those seen with reoperative mitral valve surgery, which poses issues in young patients who have a higher cumulative incidence of reintervention.

Indexed as

Heart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationMitral ValveHeart Valve DiseasesHumansMitral Valve InsufficiencyReoperationbiological mitral prosthesismechanical mitral prosthesismitral valve diseasemitral valve repairmitral valve replacementyoung patients

Identifiers

PMID38985451
PMCPMC11457673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.