Trial reportUpdates in surgery2024
3D printing and intelligent technology increase convenience, reliability, and patient acceptance of ostomy nursing: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Updates in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application and Efficacy Evaluation of a Modified Ostomy Appliance in Managing Peristomal Irritant Contact Dermatitis: A Randomised Controlled Trial.International wound journal · 2025Trial
- Stoma Leakage: Prevalence, Associated Factors, and Assessment Tools-A Scoping Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Review
- Evidence-based leakage management in cancer-preventive ileostomy care: A Delphi consensus integrating systematic review and clinical expertise.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional ostomy bags commonly cause skin allergy and inflammation around the stoma, as well as leakage. This study aimed to examine the effect of a 3D-printed ostomy bag with sensors and stimulators on stoma nursing. This is a randomized controlled trial. This trial involved 113 distinct individuals who undergo colorectal cancer surgery and intestinal obstruction surgery, with resulting stoma. The date of trial registration was January 17, 2019, and the date of first recruitment was May 1, 2019. Patients were randomized into two groups: intelligent 3D-printed ostomy bag (3D group, n = 57) and Coloplast one-piece pouching systems (control group, n = 56). The shape of ostomy and the surrounding skin of all the 57 patients of the 3D group was scanned by a handheld 3D scanner. Then, the ostomy bag chassis (also known as skin barrier) was 3D printed and an intelligent device adhered to the ostomy bag. The wearing time, leakage rate, the Discoloration, Erosion, and Tissue Overgrowth (DET) score, and the Acceptance of Illness Scale (AIS) were observed. In the 3D-printed bag group, the time to wear (0.7 ± 0.4 m) was significantly shorter than that of the control group (9.1 ± 3.5 m). The leakage rate of 3D-printed bag (1.75%) was significantly lower than that of the control group (16.1%). The DET score for the 3D-printed bag group was also lower than that of the control group, and the AIS score for the 3D-printed bag group was higher than that of the control group. The 3D-printed ostomy bags and the linked computer program can significantly reduce wearing time, leakage rate, and stoma complications. This may improve the quality of home ostomy care for patients and reduce the incidence of skin complications around the stoma.Registration number: ChiCTR1900020752.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38985377What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.