Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38985361›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024

"Not me!" a qualitative, vignette-based study of nurses' and physicians' reactions to spiritual distress on neuro-oncological units.

Daniela Völz, Reinhard Grabenweger, Megan C Best, Peter Hau, Kate F Jones, Ralf Linker, Piret Paal, Elisabeth Bumes

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniela VölzDepartment of Neurology and Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5274-1179
Reinhard GrabenwegerInstitute of Nursing Science and Practice, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1394-9824
Megan C BestInstitute for Ethics and Society, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1570-8872
Peter HauDepartment of Neurology and Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3894-5053
Kate F JonesInstitute for Ethics and Society, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Ralf LinkerDepartment of Neurology and Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany.
Piret PaalInstitute of Palliative Care, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1341-3248
Elisabeth BumesDepartment of Neurology and Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany. elisabeth.bumes@ukr.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6915-3206

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePeople with primary malignant brain tumors experience serious health-related suffering caused by limited prognosis and high symptom burden. Consequently, neuro-oncological healthcare workers can be affected emotionally in a negative way. The aim of this study was to analyze the attitudes and behavior of nurses and physicians when confronted with spiritual distress in these patients.

methodsNeurospirit-DE is a qualitative vignette-based, multicenter, cross-sectional online survey that was conducted in Bavaria, Germany. Reflexive thematic analysis was used for data analysis.

resultsA total of 143 nurses and physicians working in neurological and neurosurgical wards in 46 hospitals participated in the survey. The participants questioned if the ability to provide spiritual care can be learned or is a natural skill. Spiritual care as a responsibility of the whole team was highlighted, and the staff reflected on the appropriate way of involving spiritual care experts. The main limitations to spiritual care were a lack of time and not viewing spiritual engagement as part of the professional role. Some were able to personally benefit from spiritual conversations with patients, but many participants criticized the perceived emotional burden while expressing the imminent need for specific training and team reflection.

conclusionsMost neuro-oncological nurses and physicians perceive spiritual care as part of their duty and know how to alleviate the patient's spiritual distress. Nonetheless, validation of spiritual assessment tools for neuro-oncology and standardized documentation of patients' distress, shared interprofessional training, and reflection on the professional and personal challenges faced when confronted with spiritual care in neuro-oncology require further improvement and training.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelQualitative ResearchSpiritualityAdultBrain NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNursesPhysiciansStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesAttitudeBrain tumorNeuro-oncologySpiritual careSpiritual distress

Identifiers

PMID38985361
PMCPMC11236889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.