ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2024
Incidence of and Risk Factors for Post-Operative Urinary Retention Following Surgery for Perineal Tears Among Ugandan Women: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- IUGA International Guidelines on Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Incidence and Risk Factors of Postoperative Urinary Retention in Gynecologic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical epidemiology · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a risk prediction model for postoperative urinary retention after gynecologic abdominal-pelvic surgery.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Postoperative Urinary Retention: A Call for Objective Assessment and Standardized Postoperative Protocols.Cureus · 2025Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Transanal Drainage Tube Placement Following Surgical Repair for Chronic III-IV Perineal Tears.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- A Commentary on "Incidence and Risk Factors for Post-Operative Urinary Retention Following Surgery for Perineal Tears among Ugandan Women: A Prospective Cohort Study".International urogynecology journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisWe aimed to determine the incidence and risk factors for post-operative urinary retention (POUR) following surgery for perineal tears, and to determine the time to normal voiding after POUR.
methodsThis was a prospective cohort study of women who underwent surgery for old (≥ 3 months) obstetric perineal tears from January 2022 to December 2023. The diagnosis of POUR was made in a woman who completely failed to void despite a full bladder or, one who had post-void residual (PVR) > 150 ml within 10 min of voiding. Return to normal voiding was considered if a patient with POUR had two consecutive PVRs of ≤ 150 ml. Descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regression were performed to determine risk factors for POUR.
resultsA total of 153 participants were enrolled in this study with a mean age of 35.9 (SD ± 10.8) years. The incidence of POUR was 19.6% (30/153, 95% CI 14.02-26.7), and the median time to normal voiding for these patients was 42.4 h (range 24-72). Risk factors for POUR included repeat perineal tear surgery (RR = 4.24; 95% CI 1.16-15.52; p = 0.029) and early urinary catheter removal (RR = 2.89; 95% CI 1.09-7.67; p = 0.033).
conclusionPost-operative urinary retention following surgery for perineal tears is common. The time to return to normal voiding in patients with POUR is short. Women having repeat perineal tear surgery and those in whom the urinary catheter is removed early were more likely to experience POUR. Delayed urinary catheter removal could be considered, especially in patients undergoing repeat perineal tear surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.