ArticleWorld journal of urology2024
Endourological society fellowship program: a real contribution to improve surgical outcomes of stone patients treated with ureteroscopy.
Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe assessed the impact of the one-year endourological society fellowship program (ESFP) on the achievement of optimal surgical outcomes (OSO) in stone patients treated with ureteroscopy (URS). MATERIALS AND
methodsWe identified 303 stone patients treated with URS from January 2018 to June 2022 by five experienced surgeons (ES). Of those, two attended ESFP. OSO was defined as the presence of residual fragments ≤ 4 mm at 1-month post-operative imaging (Ultrasound + X - Ray or CT scan). Descriptive statistics explored patients' characteristics and the rate of OSO according to the attendance of ESFP. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses (UVA and MVA) tested the impact of stone characteristics, surgical data, ESFP, and imaging technique on the rate of OSO. The LOWESS curve explored the graphical association between stone size and the multivariable-adjusted probability of OSO in the two groups of surgeons.
resultsOf 303 patients, 208 (69%) were treated by the two surgeons who attended ESFP. OSO was achieved in 66% and 52% of patients treated by ES with and without ESFP, respectively (p = 0.01). At UVA, ESFP (OR = 1.78; 95% CI = 1.09-2.90), stone diameter (OR = 0.92; 95% CI = 0.88-0.96), stone location (kidney vs. ureter; OR = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.21-0.58), imaging technique (CT scan vs. Ultrasound + X-Ray; OR = 0.28; 95% CI = 0.16-0.47) predicted OSO achievement (all p < 0.05). At MVA analyses, ESFP was associated with OSO (OR = 2.24; 95% CI = 1.29-3.88; p < 0.05), along with the other aforementioned variables. The LOWESS curve showed that the greater the stone size, the greater the difference in OSO in the two groups of surgeons.
conclusionsESFP positively affects OSO achievement after URS, especially in patients with a high stone burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38985297What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.