ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2024
COVID-19-Associated Cerebellar Ataxia: A Case Series.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prolonged Anti-Zic4 Antibody-Positive Cerebellar Degeneration Following COVID-19 Infection.Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2026Article
- FDG-PET in Autoimmune Cerebellar Ataxia: Clinical Correlation and Diagnostic Superiority Over MRI.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
COVID-19-associated cerebellar ataxia has rarely been reported and its clinical characteristics remain understudied. This study aims to report patients with COVID-19-associated cerebellar ataxia from our institution. COVID-19-associated cerebellar ataxia was diagnosed based on the prodromal COVID-19 infection and the exclusion of other causes. This study provides a summary of the patients' clinical presentations, neuroimaging features, and the results of anti-cerebellar antibody examinations. Our study included 11 patients and 4 were male. The median onset age was 38 years. Five patients also demonstrated signs of encephalopathy. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was either unremarkable (n = 6) or showed bilateral cerebellar lesions (n = 5), which were typically transient, although brain atrophy could be observed later in the disease course. Anti-Homer-3 and anti-Yo antibodies were each detected in one patient, respectively. All patients received immunotherapy and nine improved. Compared with the late-onset group, individuals who exhibited ataxia earlier following COVID-19 onset (interval<5 days) were significantly younger [median age 18 (15.5-31) vs. 53.5 (44-64.8) years, p = 0.009] and more likely to present with encephalopathy (5/5 vs. 0/6, p = 0.002).They also experienced more severe symptoms [median modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at zenith 5 (5-5) vs. 2 (1.75-2.75), p = 0.017] and had a less favorable prognosis [median mRS score at the last follow-up 4 (2-5) vs. 1 (0-1.25), p = 0.009]. COVID-19-associated cerebellar ataxia can appear with encephalopathy. Brain MRI may show transient bilateral cerebellar lesions and brain atrophy later. Patients who exhibited ataxia earlier following COVID-19 were younger, had more severe symptoms and poorer outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38985238What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.