Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38985234›Full record

ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2024

Estimating the prevalence and clinical causality of obstructive sleep apnea in paediatric narcolepsy patients.

Chaofan Geng, Chen Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chaofan GengDepartment of Neurology & Innovation Center for Neurological Disorders, Xuanwu Hospital, National Center for Neurological Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Chen ChenDepartment of Neurology & Innovation Center for Neurological Disorders, Xuanwu Hospital, National Center for Neurological Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. chenchensjnk@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNumerous risk factors in paediatric narcolepsy may predispose them to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The concurrent presence of OSA in these patients might lead to underdiagnosing narcolepsy. This research investigates the prevalence and potential causality between OSA and paediatric narcolepsy.

methodsA case-control study coupled with a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was employed to explore the prevalence and causal link between paediatric narcolepsy and OSA risk.

resultsThe case-control study revealed that paediatric narcolepsy patients are at an increased risk of OSA, with an Odds ratio (OR) of 4.87 (95% CI: 2.20-10.71; P < 0.001). The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) model further suggests a potential causal link between narcolepsy and OSA (IVW OR: 4.671, 95% CI: 1.925-11.290; P < 0.001). Additionally, sensitivity analysis confirmed these findings' reliability.

conclusionThe findings highlight an elevated prevalence and genetic susceptibility to OSA among paediatric narcolepsy patients, underscoring the necessity for clinical screening of OSA. Continued research is essential to clarify the pathogenic mechanisms and develop potential treatments.

Indexed as

Mendelian Randomization AnalysisNarcolepsySleep Apnea, ObstructiveAdolescentCase-Control StudiesCausalityChildChild, PreschoolComorbidityFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMalePrevalenceRisk FactorsCausal relationshipsMendelian randomizationNarcolepsyObstructive sleep apneaPrevalence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.