ArticleBlood advances2024
Permissible HLA mismatches in 9/10 unrelated donor pediatric stem cell transplants using HLA-EMMA: an EBMT Inborn Errors Working Party study.
Article in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractAllogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with mismatched unrelated donors (MMUD) is associated with inferior outcome compared with matched unrelated donors (MUDs). We aimed to identify permissible mismatches using HLA epitope mismatch algorithm, which determines permissibility by analyzing amino acid sequences, in a single-center cohort of 70 pediatric 9/10 MMUD HSCTs and 157 10/10 MUDs for comparison. Amino acid matching was evaluated for the whole HLA protein, the α-helices, and the β-sheets, in both host vs graft (HvG) and graft vs host (GvH) direction. Superior event-free survival (EFS) was found in 13 patients permissibly mismatched in the HvG direction (totalHvG, 92% vs 58% at 1 year; P = .009) and in 21 patients matched on the α-helices (αHvG, 90% vs 53%; P = .002). These rates were similar to EFS rates in patients with 10/10 MUDs (90% vs 80%; P = .60). EFS was not related to β-sheet amino acid matching, nor to matching in the GvH direction. Overall survival (OS) rates trended similarly to those of EFS for amino acid mismatches (totalHvG, 92% vs 74%; P = .075; αHvG, 90% vs 71%; P = .072). These findings were reproduced in an EBMT Registry inborn errors cohort of 271 pediatric 9/10 MMUD HSCTs and 929 10/10 MUD HSCTs, showing a significant effect of αHvG matching on both OS and EFS and similar OS and EFS between αHvG matched MMUDs and 10/10 MUDs. In summary, HvG amino acid matching on the α-helices identifies 9/10 MMUDs with permissible mismatches, which are correlated with favorable transplant outcomes similar to those of matched donors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.