ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
[Fillet flap transfer as alternative to conventional lower limb amputation].
Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe fitting of a prosthesis after lower limb amputation is associated with several challenges. Skeletal stump-prosthesis interfaces and selective nerve transfer can partially overcome these but are also associated with new impairments that emphasize the necessity of innovative approaches. The concept of so-called spare part surgery with the use of fillet flaps could play an important role in this respect.
objectiveAn overview of the classical prosthesis-associated discomforts, advantages and disadvantages of treatment strategies and presentation of alternative surgical concepts. MATERIAL AND
methodsA selective literature search was carried out considering the experiences of the authors and perspectives with respect to the advantages and disadvantages of the surgical treatment options. Furthermore, a clinical case is presented. RESULTS AND
conclusionThe transfer of the sole of the foot as a fillet flap to the weight-bearing region of the amputation stump offers a number of benefits, such as creating a fully weight-bearing stump, prevention of neuralgia, preserved sensation and conservation of the body image. As long as the calcaneal region is not impaired, this technique can be performed in amputations below as well as above the knee. The question of whether parts of the bone should be included in the transfer must be individually evaluated for each patient. This approach enables optimization of the residual limb stump for the subsequent fitting of a prosthesis for the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.