Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38984897›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2024

Femorotibial angle scan-rescan reproducibility: A high-precision calculation on a large cohort.

Thomas A G Hall, Gareth G Jones, Richard J van Arkel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Femorotibial angle scan-rescan reproducibility: A high-precision calculation on a large cohort.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas A G HallDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Biomechanics Group, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6695-1130
Gareth G JonesMSk Lab, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Richard J van ArkelDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Biomechanics Group, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1301-1337

Funding

Foundation for the National Institutes of HealthMerck Research Laboratories; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer IncNational Institutes of Health, a branch of the Department of Health and Human Services and conducted by the OAI Study Investigators N01-AR-2-2258National Institutes of Health, a branch of the Department of Health and Human Services and conducted by the OAI Study Investigators N01-AR-2-2259National Institutes of Health, a branch of the Department of Health and Human Services and conducted by the OAI Study Investigators N01-AR-2-2260National Institutes of Health, a branch of the Department of Health and Human Services and conducted by the OAI Study Investigators N01-AR-2-2261National Institutes of Health, a branch of the Department of Health and Human Services and conducted by the OAI Study Investigators N01-AR-2-2262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFemorotibial angle (FTA) is a convenient measure of coronal knee alignment that can be extracted from a short knee radiograph, avoiding the additional radiation exposure and specialist equipment required for full-leg radiographs. While intra- and inter-reader reproducibility from the same image has been reported, the full scan-rescan reproducibility across images, as calculated in this study, has not.

methodsIn this study, 4589 FTA measurement pairs from 2586 subjects acquired a year apart were used to estimate FTA scan-rescan reproducibility using data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Subjects with radiographic progression of osteoarthritis or other conditions that may cause a change in coronal knee alignment were excluded. Measurement pairs were analysed using paired-samples

resultsThe 95% limit of agreement and the paired-samples correlation were calculated with high precision to be [-1.76°, +1.78°] and 0.938, considerably worse than the corresponding figures for intra- and inter-reader reproducibility, without relation to symptomatic or radiographic changes in knee condition. This error will weakly attenuate

conclusionThe scan-rescan reproducibility in FTA is almost double the intra- and inter-reader reliability from a single scan. At almost ±2° accuracy, FTA is inappropriate for surgical use, but it is sufficiently reproducible to produce good correlations in studies predicting disease incidence and progression. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, retrospective study.

Indexed as

FemurKnee JointOsteoarthritis, KneeRadiographyTibiaAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of Resultsalignmentbiomechanicsosteoarthritisradiography

Identifiers

PMID38984897
PMCPMC11605032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.