Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38984785›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2024

Defined synthetic microbial communities colonize and benefit field-grown sorghum.

Citlali Fonseca-García, Dean Pettinga, Andrew Wilson, Joshua R Elmore, Ryan McClure, Jackie Atim, Julie Pedraza, Robert Hutmacher, Halbay Turumtay, Yang Tian and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Principles for Rigorous Design and Application of Synthetic Microbial Communities.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Citlali Fonseca-GarcíaPlant Gene Expression Center, USDA-ARS, Albany, CA 94710, United States.
Dean PettingaPlant Gene Expression Center, USDA-ARS, Albany, CA 94710, United States.
Andrew WilsonBiological Science Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, United States.
Joshua R ElmoreBiological Science Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, United States.
Ryan McClureBiological Science Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, United States.
Jackie AtimUniversity of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Kearney Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Parlier, CA 93648, United States.
Julie PedrazaUniversity of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Kearney Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Parlier, CA 93648, United States.
Robert HutmacherWest Side Research and Extension Center, Five Points, CA 93624, United States.
Halbay TurumtayJoint BioEnergy Institute and Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States.
Yang TianJoint BioEnergy Institute and Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States.
Aymerick EudesJoint BioEnergy Institute and Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States.
Henrik V SchellerDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States.
Robert G EgbertBiological Science Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, United States.
Devin Coleman-DerrPlant Gene Expression Center, USDA-ARS, Albany, CA 94710, United States.

Funding

US Department of Agriculture 2030-21430-008-00D
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rhizosphere constitutes a dynamic interface between plant hosts and their associated microbial communities. Despite the acknowledged potential for enhancing plant fitness by manipulating the rhizosphere, the engineering of the rhizosphere microbiome through inoculation has posed significant challenges. These challenges are thought to arise from the competitive microbial ecosystem where introduced microbes must survive, and the absence of adaptation to the specific metabolic and environmental demands of the rhizosphere. Here, we engineered a synthetic rhizosphere community (SRC1) with the anticipation that it would exhibit a selective advantage in colonizing the host Sorghum bicolor, thereby potentially fostering its growth. SRC1 was assembled from bacterial isolates identified either for their potential role in community cohesion through network analysis or for their ability to benefit from host-specific exudate compounds. The growth performance of SRC1 was assessed in vitro on solid media, in planta under gnotobiotic laboratory conditions, and in the field. Our findings reveal that SRC1 cohesion is most robust when cultivated in the presence of the plant host under laboratory conditions, with lineages being lost from the community when grown either in vitro or in a native field setting. We establish that SRC1 effectively promotes the growth of both above- and below-ground plant phenotypes in both laboratory and native field contexts. Furthermore, in laboratory conditions, these growth enhancements correlate with the transcriptional dampening of lignin biosynthesis in the host. Collectively, these results underscore the potential utility of synthetic microbial communities for modulating crop performance in controlled and native environments alike.

Indexed as

BacteriaMicrobiotaRhizosphereSoil MicrobiologySorghumPlant RootsmicrobiomePGPRsrhizospheresorghumsynthetic community

Identifiers

PMID38984785
PMCPMC11410050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.