ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
Weighted centroid trees: a general approach to summarize phylogenies in single-labeled tumor mutation tree inference.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- General-purpose topology-aware embedding of tumor phylogenetic trees with graph neural networks.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationTumor trees, which depict the evolutionary process of cancer, provide a backbone for discovering recurring evolutionary processes in cancer. While they are not the primary information extracted from genomic data, they are valuable for this purpose. One such extraction method involves summarizing multiple trees into a single representative tree, such as consensus trees or supertrees.
resultsWe define the "weighted centroid tree problem" to find the centroid tree of a set of single-labeled rooted trees through the following steps: (i) mapping the given trees into the Euclidean space, (ii) computing the weighted centroid matrix of the mapped trees, and (iii) finding the nearest mapped tree (NMTP) to the centroid matrix. We show that this setup encompasses previously studied parent-child and ancestor-descendent metrics as well as the GraPhyC and TuELiP consensus tree algorithms. Moreover, we show that, while the NMTP problem is polynomial-time solvable for the adjacency embedding, it is NP-hard for ancestry and distance mappings. We introduce integer linear programs for NMTP in different setups where we also provide a new algorithm for the case of ancestry embedding called 2-AncL2, that uses a novel weighting scheme for ancestry signals. Our experimental results show that 2-AncL2 has a superior performance compared to available consensus tree algorithms. We also illustrate our setup's application on providing representative trees for a large real breast cancer dataset, deducing that the cluster centroid trees summarize reliable evolutionary information about the original dataset. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/vasei/WAncILP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.