ArticleAutophagy2024
Let's talk about flux: the rising potential of autophagy rate measurements in disease.
Article in Autophagy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- CircADAM9 activates autophagy via miR-302b-3p/ULK1 axis to improve depressive-like behaviors.Biology direct · 2026Article
- Image-based morphological profiling of autophagy phenotypes in Zika virus infected cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- On professional mutualism: a blueprint for early-career virologists.Journal of virology · 2025Review
- Image-based temporal profiling of autophagy-related phenotypes.Autophagy reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Macroautophagy/autophagy is increasingly implicated in a variety of diseases, making it an attractive therapeutic target. However, many aspects of autophagy are not fully understood and its impact on many diseases remains debatable and context-specific. The lack of systematic and dynamic measurements in these cases is a key reason for this ambiguity. In recent years, Loos et al. 2014 and Beesabathuni et al. 2022 developed methods to quantitatively measure autophagy holistically. In this commentary, we pose some of the unresolved biological questions regarding autophagy and consider how quantitative measurements may address them. While the applications are ever-expanding, we provide specific use cases in cancer, virus infection, and mechanistic screening. We address how the rate measurements themselves are central to developing cancer therapies and present ways in which these tools can be leveraged to dissect the complexities of virus-autophagy interactions. Screening methods can be combined with rate measurements to mechanistically decipher the labyrinth of autophagy regulation in cancer and virus infection. Taken together, these approaches have the potential to illuminate the underlying mechanisms of various diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.