ReviewJournal of pathology informatics2024
Joining forces for pathology diagnostics with AI assistance: The EMPAIA initiative.
Review in Journal of pathology informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Entity-aware pathology workflow informatics: Structured evidence mapping and a reference architecture for governed orchestration.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Review
- Digital pathology platforms with integrated AI algorithms: a structured landscape analysis and recommendations for clinical implementation.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Digital pathology imaging artificial intelligence in cancer research and clinical trials: An NCI workshop report.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in genitourinary pathology.Histopathology · 2026Review
- Attitudes toward artificial intelligence in pathology: a survey-based study of pathologists in northern India.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2025Article
- PD-L1 expression assessment in Angiosarcoma improves with artificial intelligence support.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025Article
- Advancing open-source visual analytics in digital pathology: A systematic review of tools, trends, and clinical applications.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025Review
- An equivalency and efficiency study for one year digital pathology for clinical routine diagnostics in an accredited tertiary academic center.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025Review
- Computational pathology for breast cancer: Where do we stand for prognostic applications?Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2025Review
- Pathology in the artificial intelligence era: Guiding innovation and implementation to preserve human insight.Academic pathologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past decade, artificial intelligence (AI) methods in pathology have advanced substantially. However, integration into routine clinical practice has been slow due to numerous challenges, including technical and regulatory hurdles in translating research results into clinical diagnostic products and the lack of standardized interfaces. The open and vendor-neutral EMPAIA initiative addresses these challenges. Here, we provide an overview of EMPAIA's achievements and lessons learned. EMPAIA integrates various stakeholders of the pathology AI ecosystem, i.e., pathologists, computer scientists, and industry. In close collaboration, we developed technical interoperability standards, recommendations for AI testing and product development, and explainability methods. We implemented the modular and open-source EMPAIA Platform and successfully integrated 14 AI-based image analysis apps from eight different vendors, demonstrating how different apps can use a single standardized interface. We prioritized requirements and evaluated the use of AI in real clinical settings with 14 different pathology laboratories in Europe and Asia. In addition to technical developments, we created a forum for all stakeholders to share information and experiences on digital pathology and AI. Commercial, clinical, and academic stakeholders can now adopt EMPAIA's common open-source interfaces, providing a unique opportunity for large-scale standardization and streamlining of processes. Further efforts are needed to effectively and broadly establish AI assistance in routine laboratory use. To this end, a sustainable infrastructure, the non-profit association EMPAIA International, has been established to continue standardization and support broad implementation and advocacy for an AI-assisted digital pathology future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.