Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38984151›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2024

Enhancing poststroke hand movement recovery: Efficacy of RehabSwift, a personalized brain-computer interface system.

Sam Darvishi, Anupam Datta Gupta, Anne Hamilton-Bruce, Simon Koblar, Mathias Baumert, Derek Abbott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sam DarvishiRehabSwift Pty Ltd, 10 Pulteney Street, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6152-6055
Anupam Datta GuptaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA 5011, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5182-6919
Anne Hamilton-BruceStroke Research Programme, Basil Hetzel Institute, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Woodville, SA 5011, Australia.
Simon KoblarAdelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Mathias BaumertSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2984-2167
Derek AbbottSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0945-2674

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores the efficacy of our novel and personalized brain-computer interface (BCI) therapy, in enhancing hand movement recovery among stroke survivors. Stroke often results in impaired motor function, posing significant challenges in daily activities and leading to considerable societal and economic burdens. Traditional physical and occupational therapies have shown limitations in facilitating satisfactory recovery for many patients. In response, our study investigates the potential of motor imagery-based BCIs (MI-BCIs) as an alternative intervention. In this study, MI-BCIs translate imagined hand movements into actions using a combination of scalp-recorded electrical brain activity and signal processing algorithms. Our prior research on MI-BCIs, which emphasizes the benefits of proprioceptive feedback over traditional visual feedback and the importance of customizing the delay between brain activation and passive hand movement, led to the development of RehabSwift therapy. In this study, we recruited 12 chronic-stage stroke survivors to assess the effectiveness of our solution. The primary outcome measure was the Fugl-Meyer upper extremity (FMA-UE) assessment, complemented by secondary measures including the action research arm test, reaction time, unilateral neglect, spasticity, grip and pinch strength, goal attainment scale, and FMA-UE sensation. Our findings indicate a remarkable improvement in hand movement and a clinically significant reduction in poststroke arm and hand impairment following 18 sessions of neurofeedback training. The effects persisted for at least 4 weeks posttreatment. These results underscore the potential of MI-BCIs, particularly our solution, as a prospective tool in stroke rehabilitation, offering a personalized and adaptable approach to neurofeedback training.

Indexed as

brain–computer interfacesneurorehabilitationneurotechnologystrokestroke rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID38984151
PMCPMC11232286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.