Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38984129›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in ophthalmology2024

Enhancing ectasia screening using advanced AS-OCT: a case series of challenging refractive candidates.

Niklas Mohr, Stefan Kassumeh, Nikolaus Luft, Martin Dirisamer, Siegfried G Priglinger, Wolfgang J Mayer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Corneal biomechanical changes in patients with anterior chamber inflammation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Niklas MohrDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
Stefan KassumehDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
Nikolaus LuftDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
Martin DirisamerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
Siegfried G PriglingerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
Wolfgang J MayerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Ectasia screening in candidates for laser refractive surgery is mandatory during preoperative evaluation. Despite the availability of modern imaging techniques, refractive surgeons often face borderline decisions when patients present with suspicious tomographic findings. This case series presents refractive candidates with suspicious tomographic findings and demonstrates how to interpret them using Scheimpflug imaging and additional anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, LMU Munich. Case series: This case series examines six potential candidates for refractive surgery with a mean age of 29.2 ± 3.9 years, whose corneal assessments using Scheimpflug imaging raised suspicion for ectasia. Each candidate was additionally examined with AS-OCT and reevaluated. The mean manifest subjective spherical equivalent was -3.67 ± 1.8 diopters. The total corneal thickness measured 537 µm ± 30 µm at its thinnest point. None of the candidates had any reported underlying corneal or ophthalmic diseases, and slit lamp examinations revealed no abnormal morphological findings. Conclusions: Both Scheimpflug imaging and AS-OCT are appropriate tools for screening refractive candidates for ectasia. While topographic and elevation analyses yielded comparable results regarding corneal structure, the epithelial mapping provided by AS-OCT played a critical role in decision-making for cases with borderline tomographic findings. Establishing a global consensus on the use of epithelial mapping in ectasia screening is necessary.

Indexed as

AS-OCTcorneal tomographyectasia screeningepithelial mappingkeratorefractive surgery

Identifiers

PMID38984129
PMCPMC11182286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.