Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38984126›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in ophthalmology2024

The utilization of artificial intelligence in glaucoma: diagnosis versus screening.

Mo'ath AlShawabkeh, Saif Aldeen AlRyalat, Muawyah Al Bdour, Ayat Alni'mat, Mousa Al-Akhras

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Stakeholder Attitudes on AI Integration in Ophthalmology.Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Artificial Intelligence for Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma.Translational vision science & technology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mo'ath AlShawabkehDepartment of Ophthalmology, Al Taif Eye Center, Amman, Jordan.
Saif Aldeen AlRyalatDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Muawyah Al BdourDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Ayat Alni'matDepartment of Ophthalmology, Al Taif Eye Center, Amman, Jordan.
Mousa Al-AkhrasDepartment of Computer Information Systems, School of Information Technology and Systems, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With advancements in the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in different ophthalmology disciplines, it continues to have a significant impact on glaucoma diagnosis and screening. This article explores the distinct roles of AI in specialized ophthalmology clinics and general practice, highlighting the critical balance between sensitivity and specificity in diagnostic and screening models. Screening models prioritize sensitivity to detect potential glaucoma cases efficiently, while diagnostic models emphasize specificity to confirm disease with high accuracy. AI applications, primarily using machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), have been successful in detecting glaucomatous optic neuropathy from colored fundus photographs and other retinal imaging modalities. Diagnostic models integrate data extracted from various forms of modalities (including tests that assess structural optic nerve damage as well as those evaluating functional damage) to provide a more nuanced, accurate and thorough approach to diagnosing glaucoma. As AI continues to evolve, the collaboration between technology and clinical expertise should focus more on improving specificity of glaucoma diagnostic models to assess ophthalmologists to revolutionize glaucoma diagnosis and improve patients care.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningdiagnosisglaucomascreening

Identifiers

PMID38984126
PMCPMC11182276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.