Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38984104›Full record

ArticleAdvances in neural information processing systems2023

Human-in-the-Loop Optimization for Deep Stimulus Encoding in Visual Prostheses.

Jacob Granley, Tristan Fauvel, Matthew Chalk, Michael Beyeler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluating Deep Human-in-the-Loop Optimization for Retinal Implants Using Sighted Participants.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Aligning Visual Prosthetic Development With Implantee Needs.Translational vision science & technology · 2024
    Article
  9. Aligning visual prosthetic development with implantee needs.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Predicting the Temporal Dynamics of Prosthetic Vision.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jacob GranleyDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Tristan FauvelInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, 17 rue Moreau, F-75012 Paris, France, Now with Quinten Health.
Matthew ChalkInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, 17 rue Moreau, F-75012 Paris, France.
Michael BeyelerDepartment of Computer Science, Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara.

Funding

Towards a Smart Bionic Eye: AI-Powered Artificial Vision for the Treatment of Incurable BlindnessDP2LM014268 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI BEYELER, MICHAEL · 2022 to 2025
$2.0M
NLM NIH HHS DP2 LM014268
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroprostheses show potential in restoring lost sensory function and enhancing human capabilities, but the sensations produced by current devices often seem unnatural or distorted. Exact placement of implants and differences in individual perception lead to significant variations in stimulus response, making personalized stimulus optimization a key challenge. Bayesian optimization could be used to optimize patient-specific stimulation parameters with limited noisy observations, but is not feasible for high-dimensional stimuli. Alternatively, deep learning models can optimize stimulus encoding strategies, but typically assume perfect knowledge of patient-specific variations. Here we propose a novel, practically feasible approach that overcomes both of these fundamental limitations. First, a deep encoder network is trained to produce optimal stimuli for any individual patient by inverting a forward model mapping electrical stimuli to visual percepts. Second, a preferential Bayesian optimization strategy utilizes this encoder to optimize patient-specific parameters for a new patient, using a minimal number of pairwise comparisons between candidate stimuli. We demonstrate the viability of this approach on a novel, state-of-the-art visual prosthesis model. We show that our approach quickly learns a personalized stimulus encoder, leads to dramatic improvements in the quality of restored vision, and is robust to noisy patient feedback and misspecifications in the underlying forward model. Overall, our results suggest that combining the strengths of deep learning and Bayesian optimization could significantly improve the perceptual experience of patients fitted with visual prostheses and may prove a viable solution for a range of neuroprosthetic technologies.

Identifiers

PMID38984104
PMCPMC11232484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.