ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2024
Utility of chest x-ray for tracheostomy tube placement in pediatric patients.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Utility of chest x-ray for tracheostomy tube placement in pediatric patients.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the utility of ordering chest x-rays after pediatric tracheostomy tube placement in identifying acute, post-operative complications and how it impacts clinical decision-making. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified tracheostomies performed in 139 pediatric patients through CPT codes over a 5-year period from 2013 to 2018. Manual chart review was performed for demographic and clinical characteristics, pre-procedure and post-procedure chest x-ray interpretations, and the presence of complications. Each complication was reviewed to see if action was taken due to post-procedure chest x-ray findings. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine associations with changes in pre-procedure versus post-procedure chest x-rays. Results: In a cohort of 139 pediatric patients with pre-procedure and post-procedure chest x-rays, 40 (28.8%) of patients had new significant post-procedure chest x-ray findings compared to pre-procedure chest x-ray findings. Of these 40 instances of changes in pre-procedure versus post-procedure chest x-ray findings, only eight resulted in action being taken due to the observed findings. Among these eight instances of action being taken, only one instance involved in invasive action being taken with a bronchoscopy. With multivariable regression analysis, patient age, race, gender, and the presences of genetic syndromes, were not found to be significant risk factors in predicting changes in pre-procedure versus post-procedure chest x-ray. Conclusion: In our study, post-procedure chest x-ray after tracheostomy tube placement did not significantly impact clinical decision making. It may be worth reconsidering the value in routine chest x-rays after tracheostomy tube placement in pediatric patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.