Easing genomic surveillance: A comprehensive performance evaluation of long-read assemblers across multi-strain mixture data of HIV-1 and Other pathogenic viruses for constructing a user-friendly bioinformatic pipeline.

Background: Determining the appropriate computational requirements and software performance is essential for efficient genomic surveillance. The lack of standardized benchmarking complicates software selection, especially with limited resources. Methods: We developed a containerized benchmarking pipeline to evaluate seven long-read assemblers-Canu, GoldRush, MetaFlye, Strainline, HaploDMF, iGDA, and RVHaplo-for viral haplotype reconstruction, using both simulated and experimental Oxford Nanopore sequencing data of HIV-1 and other viruses. Benchmarking was conducted on three computational systems to assess each assembler's performance, utilizing QUAST and BLASTN for quality assessment. Results: Our findings show that assembler choice significantly impacts assembly time, with CPU and memory usage having minimal effect. Assembler selection also influences the size of the contigs, with a minimum read length of 2,000 nucleotides required for quality assembly. A 4,000-nucleotide read length improves quality further. Canu was efficient among Conclusions: The HIV-64148 pipeline, containerized using Docker, facilitates easy deployment and offers flexibility to select from a range of assemblers to match computational systems or study requirements. This tool aids in genome assembly and provides valuable information on HIV-1 sequences, enhancing viral evolution monitoring and understanding.