ArticleAdvances in knowledge discovery and data mining : ... Pacific-Asia Conference, PAKDD ..., proceedings. Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining2024
Using Multimodal Data to Improve Precision of Inpatient Event Timelines.
Article in Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining : ... Pacific-Asia Conference, PAKDD ..., proceedings. Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Forecasting Clinical Risk from Textual Time Series: Structuring Narratives for Temporal AI in Healthcare.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- A Large-Language Model Framework for Relative Timeline Extraction from PubMed Case Reports.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Textual data often describe events in time but frequently contain little information about their specific timing, whereas complementary structured data streams may have precise timestamps but may omit important contextual information. We investigate the problem in healthcare, where we produce clinician annotations of discharge summaries, with access to either unimodal (text) or multimodal (text and tabular) data, (i) to determine event interval timings and (ii) to train multimodal language models to locate those events in time. We find our annotation procedures, dashboard tools, and annotations result in high-quality timestamps. Specifically, the multimodal approach produces more precise timestamping, with uncertainties of the lower bound, upper bounds, and duration reduced by 42% (95% CI 34-51%), 36% (95% CI 28-44%), and 13% (95% CI 10-17%), respectively. In the classification version of our task, we find that, trained on our annotations, our multimodal BERT model outperforms unimodal BERT model and Llama-2 encoder-decoder models with improvements in F1 scores for upper (10% and 61%, respectively) and lower bounds (8% and 56%, respectively). The code for the annotation tool and the BERT model is available (link).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.