ArticleRegenerative therapy2024
Novel cell therapy with
Article in Regenerative therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kidney organoid vascularization: current advancements in the field.Regenerative therapy · 2026Article
- Long-term outcomes of endovascular therapy for chronic limb-threatening ischemia patients with connective tissue disease.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2025Article
- Novel breast reconstruction technique using ex vivo mononuclear (RE-01) cells and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells.Regenerative therapy · 2025Article
- The Pathogenic Role of Expanded CD8⁺CD28Biomedicines · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Autologous mononuclear cells (MNCs) have been used in vascular regenerative therapy since the identification of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs). However, the efficacy of autologous EPC therapy for diseases such as diabetes and connective tissue disorders is limited due to deficiencies in the number and function of EPCs. To address this, we developed a novel RE-01 cells that enriches pro-angiogenic cells from peripheral blood MNCs (PBMNCs). Methods: PBMNCs were collected from healthy volunteers following ethical guidelines. RE-01 cells were cultured in the presence of specific growth factors for 5 days without media change. Flow cytometry was used to analyze cell surface markers. Tube formation assays, EPC culture assays, and mRNA analysis were performed to evaluate angiogenic potential. The efficacy of RE-01 cells upon transplantation into ischemic hind limbs of mice was evaluated. Results: RE-01 cells exhibited a significant increase in pro-angiogenic cells such as M2 macrophages and angiogenic T cells, in contrast to PBMNCs, while the number of inflammatory cells reduced. Conclusions: RE-01 cells showed promising results in enhancing angiogenesis and arteriogenesis, possibly owing to the presence of M2 macrophages and angiogenic T cells. These cells also demonstrated anti-fibrotic effects. The efficacy of RE-01 cells has been confirmed in mouse models, suggesting their potential for treating ischemic vascular diseases. Clinical trials are planned to validate the safety and efficacy of RE-01 cell therapy in patients with connective tissue disease and unhealed ulcers. We hope that this new RE-01 cell therapy will prevent many patients from undergoing amputation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.