Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38983740›Full record

ArticleF&S reports2024

High rate of isolated teratospermia in a population of fertile men and the questionable clinical utility of sperm morphology.

Lucille G Cheng, David Miller, Daniel Pelzman, Anna Wecht, Kathleen Hwang

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F&S reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lucille G ChengUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
David MillerDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Daniel PelzmanDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Anna WechtDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Kathleen HwangDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To better understand the impact of sperm morphology on fertility by assessing sperm morphology in a population of known fertile men. Design: A prospective cohort study. Setting: Fertility center associated with the university. Patients: Healthy men >18 years of age were recruited to provide one semen sample before a vasectomy appointment scheduled between March 2020 and November 2022. Patients were included in the study when they had at least one biologic child and no history of difficulty achieving pregnancy or fertility procedures. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: Sperm morphology. Results: A total of 68 patients (mean age 36.7 years) were included. Thirty-eight (55.9%) patients had 3% or lower normal sperm morphology, including two patients who had 0 normal morphology. The most common morphologic abnormalities were head-shaped defects (n = 59, 84.3%), followed by coiled tails (n = 14, 20.3%). Count, concentration, motility, and progressive motility were normal in >90% of patients. Conclusions: More than half (55.9%) of fertile male patients had lower than normal sperm morphology in our study. The results of our study further question the clinical relevance of sperm morphology on fertility outcomes and when the current approach in assessing morphology is too strict.

Indexed as

fertilityisolated teratospermiaSperm morphology

Identifiers

PMID38983740
PMCPMC11228780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.