Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38983733›Full record

ArticleF&S reports2024

Management guidelines for incidental uterine surgery in early pregnancy: a case report of a robotic myomectomy at 4 weeks gestation after a false-negative pregnancy test.

Abaigeal Thompson, Melanie Evans, Patrick Weix

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F&S reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abaigeal ThompsonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Melanie EvansDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Patrick WeixDivision of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To share our case and offer guidance to practitioners on the management of incidental uterine surgery in early pregnancy. Although elective uterine surgery should be avoided during pregnancy, there is always a chance of undetected pregnancy at the time of surgery, even after all precautions have been taken. There is currently minimal literature on the management and outcomes of uterine surgery during pregnancy. Design: Case report. Setting: University Hospital. Patient: A 42-year-old G1P1 female with symptomatic fibroids desiring fertility-sparing surgery was retroactively found to be 4 weeks pregnant at the time of surgery, even after a negative pregnancy test and low suspicion for pregnancy under Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. Intervention: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy performed with a false-negative urine pregnancy test at the time of surgery. Main Outcome Measures: Guidance for surveillance and management options during continued pregnancy after robotic uterine surgery and cavity disruption by a uterine manipulator performed at 4 weeks gestation that went undetected at the time of surgery. Results: The patient was able to undergo an uncomplicated delivery by cesarean section at 38 weeks and delivered a healthy infant. Conclusion: Using a multidisciplinary approach, we describe guidelines for antepartum surveillance uterine surgery during an undetected pregnancy, which resulted in the delivery of a term healthy infant.

Indexed as

early pregnancyfertility-sparing surgerymaternal-fetal medicineMyomectomypregnancy surveillance

Identifiers

PMID38983733
PMCPMC11228875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.