ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2024
Differences in anthropometric and vertical jump force-time characteristics between U16 and U18 female basketball players.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physical fitness differences in elite youth U17 and U18 basketball players by team ranking and position.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Acute Effects of Three Recovery Interventions on Post-Practice Vertical Jump Force-Time Metrics in Female Basketball Players.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Article
- Vertical Jump and Isometric Strength in Professional Female Basketball Players: Starter vs. Non-Starter Comparison.PloS one · 2026Article
- Differences in knee-ankle configuration and ankle joint kinetic characteristics during a drop landing vertical jump task in highly trained male basketball players: a cross-sectional study based on rebound efficiency.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Inter-limb asymmetries in professional male basketball and volleyball players: bilateral vs. unilateral jump comparison.International biomechanics · 2025Article
- Offensive efficiency and traditional positional roles in Hungarian basketball: an empirical analysis.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- Drop jump performance differences between ACL-injured and healthy semi-professional male soccer players.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Considering the importance of body composition and lower-body strength and power for basketball players' on-court performance, as well as a lack of sports science research focused on female athletes, the purpose of the present investigation was to record the anthropometric and countermovement vertical jump (CMJ) characteristics of top-tier U16 and U18 female basketball players and examine between-group differences in the aforementioned tests. Thirty-two athletes who were a part of the national basketball academy volunteered to participate in the present investigation. Following the body composition assessment conducted via a segmental multifrequency bioimpedance analyzer, athletes performed three CMJs while standing on a force plate system sampling at 1000 Hz. Independent
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.