Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38983684›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2024

Effect of intravenous immunoglobulin on mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Dinesh Sangarran Ramachandram, Chia Siang Kow, Syed Shahzad Hasan, Kaeshaelya Thiruchelvam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dinesh Sangarran RamachandramSchool of Pharmacy Monash University Malaysia Bandar Sunway Selangor Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-5390-7026
Chia Siang KowSchool of Pharmacy IMU University Kuala Lumpur Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-8186-2926
Syed Shahzad HasanSchool of Applied Sciences University of Huddersfield Huddersfield United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4058-2215
Kaeshaelya ThiruchelvamSchool of Pharmacy IMU University Kuala Lumpur Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-3754-1690

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to summarize the overall effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) on mortality outcomes among hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Methods: We systematically searched electronic databases up to June 1, 2023. Pooled odds ratio (OR) of mortality with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was generated using a random-effects model. The risk of bias was appraised using the Cochrane risk-of-bias Version 2 tool for randomized trials. Results: Nine RCTs were included: three RCTs had an overall low risk of bias, four RCTs had some concerns in the overall risk of bias, and two RCTs trials had an overall high risk of bias. The use of IVIG indicated a significant reduction in the odds of mortality (pooled OR = 0.69; 95% CI 0.50-0.96) relative to nonuse of IVIG. Subgroup analysis in patients with a severe course of COVID-19 revealed no significant reduction in the odds of mortality (pooled OR = 0.58; 95% CI 0.29-1.16). Conclusions: We suggest exercising caution when interpreting effectiveness of IVIG in reducing mortality among hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Our findings emphasize for larger trials with rigorous study designs to better understand the impact of IVIG, particularly in those with severe COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID‐19immunoglobulinIVIGmortalitysafety

Identifiers

PMID38983684
PMCPMC11230917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.