ReviewCureus2024
Preparing the Younger Generation for an Aging Society: Strategies, Challenges, and Opportunities.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The relationship between social media use and loneliness across the lifespan in the United States: Population-based study using Health Information National Trends Survey data.Advances in patient-reported outcomes · 2025Article
- Operationalizing age-friendliness in urban China: a multi-case study of gated retirement and open multi-generational communities.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Digital religion and Generation Z: an empirical study in the context of China.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Lifelong learning dimensions and their associations with late-life cognitive decline: moderating roles of socioeconomic status and early life education.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Effect of structured community-based older people education program on empathy, emotional intelligence, and caring behavior among nursing students.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Bibliometric Analysis of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment from 2004 to 2023.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- Health Care Access and Quality of Life of Community-Dwelling Senior Citizens in Pampanga, Philippines.Gerontology & geriatric medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global demographic landscape is experiencing a monumental shift as populations age, driven by advances in healthcare and declining birth rates. This transition underscores the need to prepare the younger generation to navigate and contribute effectively to an aging society. This manuscript comprehensively reviews strategies to equip younger generations with the requisite knowledge, skills, and empathy to support an aging population. This study identifies critical challenges and opportunities in fostering intergenerational solidarity and understanding through an extensive analysis of existing literature and innovative educational programs. The review highlights the importance of early education, community engagement, and policy interventions in bridging the generational divide. Additionally, it explores the role of technology and digital media in facilitating awareness and empathy among young people. Key findings suggest that incorporating aging-related content into educational curricula, promoting volunteerism, and implementing supportive policies can significantly enhance the younger generation's readiness to support an aging society. The manuscript concludes with recommendations for future research and practical steps for educators, policymakers, and community leaders to foster a more inclusive and age-friendly environment. By preparing the younger generation today, we can build a more cohesive and supportive society for tomorrow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.