Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38983661›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of methodology2024

Tracheostomy-related data from an intensive care unit for two consecutive years before the COVID-19 pandemic.

Maria Papaioannou, Evdoxia Vagiana, Serafeim-Chrysovalantis Kotoulas, Maria Sileli, Katerina Manika, Alexandros Tsantos, Nikolaos Kapravelos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of methodology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria Papaioannou1 Intensive Care Unit, G Papanikolaou General Hospital, Exohi, Thessaloniki 57010, Greece.
Evdoxia Vagiana2 Intensive Care Unit, G Papanikolaou General Hospital, Exohi, Thessaloniki 57010, Greece.
Serafeim-Chrysovalantis KotoulasIntensive Care Unit, Hippokration General Hospital, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece. akiskotoulas@hotmail.com.
Maria Sileli2 Intensive Care Unit, G Papanikolaou General Hospital, Exohi, Thessaloniki 57010, Greece.
Katerina ManikaDepartment of Pulmonary, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, G. Papanikolaou General Hospital, Exohi, Thessaloniki 57010, Greece.
Alexandros Tsantos2 Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital of Thessaloniki "Ippokration", Thessaloniki 54642, Greece.
Nikolaos Kapravelos2 Intensive Care Unit, G Papanikolaou General Hospital, Exohi, Thessaloniki 57010, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTracheostomy is commonly used in intensive care unit (ICU) patients who are expected to be on long-term mechanical ventilation or suffer from emergency upper airway obstruction. However, some studies have conflicting findings regarding the optimal technique and its timing and benefits.

aimTo provide evidence of practice, characteristics, and outcome concerning tracheostomy in an ICU of a tertiary care hospital.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study including adult critical care patients in a single ICU for two consecutive years. Patients' demographic characteristics, severity of illness (APACHE II score), level of consciousness [Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)], comorbidities, timing and type of tracheostomy procedure performed and outcome were recorded. We defined late as tracheostomy placement after 8 days or no tracheotomy.

resultsData of 660 patients were analyzed (median age of 60 years), median APACHE II score of 19 and median GCS score of 12 at admission. Tracheostomy was performed in 115 patients, of whom 63 had early and 52 late procedures. Early tracheostomy was mainly executed in case of altered level of consciousness and severe critical illness polyneuromyopathy, however there were no significant statistical results (47.6%

conclusionPDT was performed more frequently in our cohort. This technique did not affect mechanical ventilation days, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), ICU length of stay, or survival. No complications were observed in the percutaneous or surgical tracheostomy groups. Patients undergoing early tracheostomy benefited in terms of mechanical ventilation days and ICU length of stay but not of discharge status, presence of VAP, or survival.

Indexed as

Early tracheostomyLate tracheostomyMechanical ventilationPercutaneous dilatation tracheostomySurgical tracheostomySurvivalTracheostomyWeaning

Identifiers

PMID38983661
PMCPMC11229867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.