Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38983542›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in ophthalmology2022

Outcomes of the advanced visualization in corneal surgery evaluation trial; a non-inferiority randomized control trial to evaluate the use of intraoperative OCT during Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Marc B Muijzer, Heleen Delbeke, Mor M Dickman, Rudy M M A Nuijts, Herke Jan Noordmans, Saskia M Imhof, Robert P L Wisse

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03763721 (The ADVISE Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03763721 nacompletednot on this map

The ADVISE Study: Advanced Visualization In Corneal Surgery Evaluation Intra-operative Optical Coherence Tomography in Posterior Lamellar Keratoplasty

TypeinterventionalSponsorUMC UtrechtRan2018 to 2022Enrolled65ConditionsFuchs Dystrophy, Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy, Bullous Keratopathy, Vision DisordersArmsintraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marc B MuijzerUtrecht Cornea Research Group, Ophthalmology Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Heleen DelbekeOphthalmology Department, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Mor M DickmanUniversity Eye Clinic, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Rudy M M A NuijtsUniversity Eye Clinic, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Herke Jan NoordmansMedical Technical and Clinical Physics Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Saskia M ImhofUtrecht Cornea Research Group, Ophthalmology Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Robert P L WisseUtrecht Cornea Research Group, Ophthalmology Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate if an intraoperative-OCT (iOCT) optimized surgical protocol without prolonged overpressure is non-inferior to a standard protocol during Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Methods: Sixty-five pseudophakic eyes of 65 patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy scheduled for routine DMEK were recruited in this prospective non-inferiority international multicenter randomized control trial. Subjects were randomized to the control arm (n=33) without iOCT-use and raising the intraocular pressure above normal physiological limits for 8 minutes (i.e., overpressure) or the intervention arm (n=32) with OCT-guidance to assess graft orientation and adherence, while refraining from prolonged overpressure. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative surgery-related adverse events (AE). The non-inferiority margin was set at a risk difference of 10%. Secondary outcomes included iOCT-aided surgical decision making, surgical times, and endothelial cell density (ECD) corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) at 6 months follow-up. Results: In the intervention group, 12 subjects developed 13 AEs compared to 13 AEs in 10 subjects in the control group (P=0.644). The risk difference measured -0.32% (95%CI: -10.29 - 9.84). The ECD and CDVA did not differ between the two groups 3 and 6 months postoperatively (P=>0.05). Surgeons reported that iOCT aided surgical decision-making in 40% of cases. Surgery and graft unfolding time were, respectively, 13% and 27% shorter in the iOCT-group. Conclusions: iOCT-guided DMEK surgery with refraining from prolonged over-pressuring was non-inferior compared to conventional treatment. Surgery times were reduced considerably and iOCT aided surgical decision-making in 40% of cases. Refraining from prolonged overpressure did not affect postoperative ECD or CDVA. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03763721 (NCT03763721).

Indexed as

corneal imagingDescemet membrane endothelial keratoplastyDMEKintraoperative OCTiOCT

Identifiers

PMID38983542
PMCPMC11182175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.