Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38983483›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of developmental disabilities2024

Familiarity of evidence based practices in Chinese caregivers of autistic children.

Moon Young Savana Bak, Amber M Reilly, Yi Yang, Hamdi Abas, Qichao Pan, Maria L Hugh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of developmental disabilities, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Moon Young Savana BakDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7568-5356
Amber M ReillyDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Yi YangDepartment of Special Education, Lingnan Normal University, Zhanjiang, China.
Hamdi AbasDepartment of Integrative Biology & Physiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Qichao PanDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5187-8898
Maria L HughDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although researchers have investigated special educators' and clinicians' knowledge and use of evidence-based practices (EBPs), there is very little research on caregivers' perception of the importance of EBPs for their autistic children. Moreover, there is even less research on how EBPs have been translated or disseminated in international communities not within the English-speaking, Western population. In order to provide appropriate support for caregivers of autistic children in all communities, we need more information to identify possible barriers that may affect caregiver involvement. We used a survey to ask 81 Chinese caregivers of autistic children in Guangzhou, China to investigate their familiarity with EBPs for autistic individuals and any external sources used inform their decision about treatment options for their autistic child. Results showed that 58.6% of the participants had no knowledge of what an EBP was and an additional 29.7% of the participants had heard of EBPs but not sure what they were. These results amplify the need for increased dispersion of ASD intervention knowledge to global communities and how to increase caregiver knowledge on treatment options for their autistic child.

Indexed as

autismcaregiver advocacycaregiver knowledgeevidence-based practice

Identifiers

PMID38983483
PMCPMC11229743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.