ArticleCureus2023
Mouth-Opener Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block: A Case Series of Extraction of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extraction of the impacted mandibular third molar (IMTM) is common in oral surgery, but its postoperative pain is severe. Ultrasound-guided inferior alveolar nerve block (UGIANB) is an analgesic technique in the mandibular nerve region. We describe UGIANB using a mouth opener and report the cases with a good postoperative course. Six patients underwent the extraction of bilateral IMTMs under general anesthesia. After surgery, we performed UGIANB and administered 5 mL of 0.375% levobupivacaine on each side. The postoperative numerical rating scale pain scores were 1 (0-2) and 2.5 (0-5) (mean (range)), postoperative day one and seven, respectively. The postoperative quality of recovery-40 scores were 188.5 (8.1) and 191.7 (7.6) (mean (SD)), postoperative day one and seven, respectively. No procedural complications were encountered. We performed UGIANB with a mouth opener on a patient with IMTM extraction and were able to provide safe and good analgesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.