Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38983337›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2024

Metabolic disorders and hepatitis: Insights from a Mendelian randomization study.

Ling-Bo Liang, Xiang-Ping Liu, Ting-Rui Mao, Qiao-Li Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ling-Bo LiangGeneral Practice Ward, General Practice Medical Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
Xiang-Ping LiuDepartment of Primary Health Care, The Fourth People's Hospital of Dazhu County, Dazhou 635100, Sichuan Province, China.
Ting-Rui MaoGeneral Practice Ward, General Practice Medical Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
Qiao-Li SuGeneral Practice Ward, General Practice Medical Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China. 18980601358@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatitis is a systemic disease that often results in various comorbidities. Meta-bolic disorders, the most common comorbidities in clinical practice, were selected for this study.

aimTo investigate the causal relationship between comorbidities and hepatitis trea-tment outcomes.

methodsA total of 23583378 single nucleotide polymorphisms from 1248743 cases and related summaries of genome-wide association studies were obtained from online public databases. A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) was performed to investigate causality between exposure [type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), hyperlipidemia, and hypertension] and outcome (chronic hepatitis B or C in-fections).

resultsThe data supported the causal relationship between comorbidities and hepatitis infections, which will affect the severity of hepatitis progression and will also provide a reference for clinical researchers. All three exposures showed a link with progression of both hepatitis B (T2D,

conclusionThe results of MR support a possible causal relationship between different ex-posures (T2D, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension) and chronic hepatitis progression; however, the potential mechanisms still need to be elucidated.

Indexed as

ComorbidityHepatitisHyperlipidemiaHypertensionType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID38983337
PMCPMC11230009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.