Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38983297›Full record

ArticleRadiology case reports2024

Identification of perineural invasion at imaging staging as a novel potential risk factor in rectal cancer: A case report.

Sara Del Tufo, Umberto Atripaldi, Antonella Nicastro, Iacopo Panarese, Davide Ciardiello, Valerio Nardone, Francesco Selvaggi, Roberto Grassi, Salvatore Cappabianca, Erika Martinelli and 1 more

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sara Del TufoDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.
Umberto AtripaldiDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.
Antonella NicastroDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.
Iacopo PanareseDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.
Davide CiardielloDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.
Valerio NardoneDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.
Francesco SelvaggiDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.
Roberto GrassiDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.
Salvatore CappabiancaDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.
Erika MartinelliDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.
Alfonso ReginelliDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment of rectal cancer has improved over the years thanks to a multidisciplinary approach. A correct staging has a fundamental role for risk stratification and to define the best treatment for each patient. Unfortunately, approximately 30% of patients with locally advanced rectal cancers will experience tumor recurrence. Thus, the identification of novel clinical-pathological and radiological prognostic factors represents an urgent unmet clinical need. Here we report the case of a patient with radically resected localized rectal cancer who developed an impressive early pelvic recurrence. To better understand the clinical scenario, we have studied the possible factors related to the aggressiveness of the disease. The only poor prognosticfactor that was evidenced at histological report was perineural invasion. Therefore, we questioned whether we could evaluate perineural invasion with imaging, similar to head and neck tumors. Learning from this clinical case, we believe that improving the risk stratification and radiology reporting is necessary to provide the best care for the patient and allow for a better prognosis prediction. Of course, our data should be considered as hypothesis generating and should be further investigated and validated in larger and prospective studies.

Indexed as

BiomarkersMRIPerineural invasionRectal cancerStaging

Identifiers

PMID38983297
PMCPMC11228643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.