Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38983266›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Intersectoral collaboration for supporting the health and wellbeing of Aboriginal families and children in out-of-home care: perspectives from Western Australian Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations.

Sasha Moodie, Jocelyn Jones, Richard Chenhall, Robyn Williams, Cathy Garlett, Alison Gibberd, Melissa O'Donnell, Dan McAullay, Bridgette McNamara, Sandra Eades

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sasha MoodieNational Drug Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Jocelyn JonesNational Drug Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Richard ChenhallMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Robyn WilliamsCurtin Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia.
Cathy GarlettMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Alison GibberdNational Drug Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Melissa O'DonnellAustralian Centre for Child Protection, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Dan McAullayKurongkurl Katitjin, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Bridgette McNamaraMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Sandra EadesMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Western Australia has one of the highest rates of Aboriginal children entering out-of-home care in Australia. Kinship care is the preferred culturally safe out-of-home care option for Aboriginal children, yet all jurisdictions, including Western Australia, are far from meeting best-practice national standards. Intersectoral collaboration is a key primary healthcare principle and internationally recognized for improving health systems and outcomes. This paper presents findings from a qualitative research project investigating Aboriginal primary healthcare workers' experiences of intersectoral collaboration challenges and strengthening opportunities. Methods: Constructivist grounded theory guided this research involving 55 semi-structured interviews and four focus group discussions with Aboriginal primary healthcare workers. The research was guided by Indigenous methodologies and led by Indigenous researchers Participants were recruited from seven Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations located across Perth metro, Pilbara, Midwest/Gascoyne and Southwest regions in Western Australia. Results: Key themes identified around intersectoral collaboration challenges were communication, including information sharing and interagency meetings, and the relationship with the government sector, including trust and the importance of the perception of Aboriginal health service independence. Key themes around strengthening areas to improve intersectoral collaboration included strengthening service resourcing and coverage, including the availability of services, and addressing high program turnover. The need for a shift in approach, including more emphasis on Aboriginal-led care and aligning approaches between sectors, was another area for strengthening. Discussion: This study addresses a significant research gap concerning out-of-home care, kinship care, and intersectoral collaboration in an Australian Aboriginal context. Findings highlighted the need to review the out-of-home and kinship models of care to strengthen the system, including creating more formal and structured modes of collaborating and better resourcing family support and kinship care.

Indexed as

Health Services, IndigenousIntersectoral CollaborationQualitative ResearchAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesChildFemaleFocus GroupsFoster Home CareGrounded TheoryHumansInterviews as TopicMaleWestern AustraliaAboriginal and Torres Strait IslanderAustraliaIndigenousintersectoral collaborationkinship careout-of-home careprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID38983266
PMCPMC11231078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.