Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38983254›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2024

Towards effective screening for paternal perinatal mental illness: a meta-review of instruments and research gaps.

Philipp Schöch, Laura Hölzle, Astrid Lampe, Christine Hörtnagl, Ingrid Zechmeister-Koss, Anna Buchheim, Jean Lillian Paul

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Screening Measures of Perinatal Mental Health and Wellbeing in Fathers: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Philipp SchöchDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics, and Medical Psychology, Division of Psychiatry I, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Laura HölzleDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics, and Medical Psychology, Division of Psychiatry I, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Astrid LampeLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Rehabilitation Research, Vienna, Austria.
Christine HörtnaglDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics, and Medical Psychology, Division of Psychiatry I, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Ingrid Zechmeister-KossAustrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment, Vienna, Austria.
Anna BuchheimDepartment of Clinical Psychology II, Institute of Psychology, University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Jean Lillian PaulDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics, and Medical Psychology, Division of Psychiatry I, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Paternal perinatal mental illness (PPMI), which affects around one in 10 fathers, is under-recognised despite increasing awareness of men's mental health in the perinatal period. Social stigma and men's reluctance to seek help exacerbate this gap. Neglecting the mental health needs of new fathers not only puts them at increased risk for mental illness themselves, but also has a profound and long-lasting impact on their families, children and their own self-esteem as they navigate their new role in the family dynamic. Objective: This meta-review systematically identifies instruments assessing PPMI symptoms, evaluates their psychometric properties and applicability, presents key findings from studies using these tools, and identifies gaps and limitations in the literature on PPMI symptom assessment. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted using search strategies applied to PubMed, PsycNet APA, Cochrane, and Web of Science, supplemented by hand searches. Relevant information was extracted from each included study. Extracted data were analysed narratively to address the research questions. Results: Findings identified limitations and gaps in current screening practices. While the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is the most widely used screening tool for both fathers and mothers, it inadequately captures atypical depressive symptoms in men. Cutoff scores lack consensus, and instrument sensitivity varies significantly due to cultural and sociodemographic factors. A number of other screening tools have been identified, most of which are more general and not specifically designed for perinatal mental health. Conclusion: This meta-review broadens perspectives on PPMI screening instruments, highlighting key themes, patterns, and differences across the included reviews. While a variety of screening tools are used, the review underscores the necessity for tools specifically tailored to fathers during the perinatal period.

Indexed as

FathersMental DisordersPsychometricsEvidence GapsFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningPregnancyanxietydepressionfatherspaternal mental healthpaternal perinatal depressionperinatalscreening instruments

Identifiers

PMID38983254
PMCPMC11231099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.