ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Machine learning approach to classifying declines of physical function and muscle strength associated with cognitive function in older women: gait characteristics based on three speeds.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of cognitive decline on the physical functioning of older adults in Southern Brazil: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- Analysis of gait characteristics to evaluate injury risk after high-intensity exercise, focusing on canoe athletes: a preliminary study.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aging process is associated with a cognitive and physical declines that affects neuromotor control, memory, executive functions, and motor abilities. Previous studies have made efforts to find biomarkers, utilizing complex factors such as gait as indicators of cognitive and physical health in older adults. However, while gait involves various complex factors, such as attention and the integration of sensory input, cognitive-related motor planning and execution, and the musculoskeletal system, research on biomarkers that simultaneously considers multiple factors is scarce. This study aimed to extract gait features through stepwise regression, based on three speeds, and evaluate the accuracy of machine-learning (ML) models based on the selected features to solve classification problems caused by declines in cognitive function (Cog) and physical function (PF), and in Cog and muscle strength (MS). Methods: Cognitive assessments, five times sit-to-stand, and handgrip strength were performed to evaluate the Cog, PF, and MS of 198 women aged 65 years or older. For gait assessment, all participants walked along a 19-meter straight path at three speeds [preferred walking speed (PWS), slower walking speed (SWS), and faster walking speed (FWS)]. The extracted gait features based on the three speeds were selected using stepwise regression. Results: The ML model accuracies were revealed as follows: 91.2% for the random forest model when using all gait features and 91.9% when using the three features (walking speed and coefficient of variation of the left double support phase at FWS and the right double support phase at SWS) selected for the Cog+PF+ and Cog-PF- classification. In addition, support vector machine showed a Cog+MS+ and Cog-MS- classification problem with 93.6% accuracy when using all gait features and two selected features (left step time at PWS and gait asymmetry at SWS). Conclusion: Our study provides insights into the gait characteristics of older women with decreased Cog, PF, and MS, based on the three walking speeds and ML analysis using selected gait features, and may help improve objective classification and evaluation according to declines in Cog, PF, and MS among older women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.