ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
Automated sentiment analysis of visually impaired students' audio feedback in virtual learning environments.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automated evaluation systems to enhance exam quality and reduce test anxiety.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research introduces an innovative intelligent model developed for predicting and analyzing sentiment responses regarding audio feedback from students with visual impairments in a virtual learning environment. Sentiment is divided into five types: high positive, positive, neutral, negative, and high negative. The model sources data from post-COVID-19 outbreak educational platforms (Microsoft Teams) and offers automated evaluation and visualization of audio feedback, which enhances students' performances. It also offers better insight into the sentiment scenarios of e-learning visually impaired students to educators. The sentiment responses from the assessment to point out deficiencies in computer literacy and forecast performance were pretty successful with the support vector machine (SVM) and artificial neural network (ANN) algorithms. The model performed well in predicting student performance using ANN algorithms on structured and unstructured data, especially by the 9th week against unstructured data only. In general, the research findings provide an inclusive policy implication that ought to be followed to provide education to students with a visual impairment and the role of technology in enhancing the learning experience for these students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.