Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38983225›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

FLMatchQA: a recursive neural network-based question answering with customized federated learning model.

Saranya M, Amutha B

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Saranya MDepartment of Computing Technologies, School of Computing, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
Amutha BDepartment of Computing Technologies, School of Computing, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More sophisticated data access is possible with artificial intelligence (AI) techniques such as question answering (QA), but regulations and privacy concerns have limited their use. Federated learning (FL) deals with these problems, and QA is a viable substitute for AI. The utilization of hierarchical FL systems is examined in this research, along with an ideal method for developing client-specific adapters. The User Modified Hierarchical Federated Learning Model (UMHFLM) selects local models for users' tasks. The article suggests employing recurrent neural network (RNN) as a neural network (NN) technique for learning automatically and categorizing questions based on natural language into the appropriate templates. Together, local and global models are developed, with the worldwide model influencing local models, which are, in turn, combined for personalization. The method is applied in natural language processing pipelines for phrase matching employing template exact match, segmentation, and answer type detection. The (SQuAD-2.0), a DL-based QA method for acquiring knowledge of complicated SPARQL test questions and their accompanying SPARQL queries across the DBpedia dataset, was used to train and assess the model. The SQuAD2.0 datasets evaluate the model, which identifies 38 distinct templates. Considering the top two most likely templates, the RNN model achieves template classification accuracy of 92.8% and 61.8% on the SQuAD2.0 and QALD-7 datasets. A study on data scarcity among participants found that FL Match outperformed BERT significantly. A MAP margin of 2.60% exists between BERT and FL Match at a 100% data ratio and an MRR margin of 7.23% at a 20% data ratio.

Indexed as

AccuracyArtificial intelligenceData scienceExact matchF1 scoreFederated learningMachine learningNatural language processingNeural networkQuestion answering

Identifiers

PMID38983225
PMCPMC11232604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.