Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38983182›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024

Needle aspiration versus tube thoracostomy in patients with symptomatic primary spontaneous pneumothorax: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Mohamed Maali Gumaa Mohamed, Setu Patolia, Ravi Nayak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohamed Maali Gumaa MohamedDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7514-7811
Setu PatoliaDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Ravi NayakDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is an important disease commonly seen in young males. While incidentally diagnosed cases can be managed conservatively, symptomatic patients often necessitate intervention. Chest tube placement (tube thoracostomy) is commonly used, at least in the USA as a primary treatment modality, which requires hospitalization. On the other hand, needle aspiration (NA) has been widely adopted due to simplicity and reported efficacy and safety. No consensus is reached regarding superiority and/or preferred modality, with a lack of guidelines agreement. Therefore, we conducted an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing NA to tube thoracostomy in patients with symptomatic PSP. Prespecified outcomes were immediate success rate, 12-month recurrence rate, post intervention complications rate, and hospital length of stay. We identified and pooled data from six randomized trials, with a total of 759 patients and a median follow up of 12 months. Our analysis showed that NA and tube thoracostomy have similar immediate success rate and 12-month recurrence rate. We also found that NA has less complication rate, need for surgical intervention, and less hospital stays. In conclusion, our review showed that in symptomatic patients with PSP, NA is as effective as tube thoracostomy regarding immediate success rate and 12-month recurrence rate, with the added benefit of less complications rate and need for surgical intervention.

Indexed as

chest tubemeta-analysisneedle aspiration (NA)Primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP)tube thoracotomy

Identifiers

PMID38983182
PMCPMC11228703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.