ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2024
The role of 3D printing in chest wall reconstruction.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bespoke Three-Dimensional Modeling for Reconstruction of a Complex Poststernotomy Chest Wall Defect.Annals of thoracic surgery short reports · 2026Article
- Bioinspired Sternal Implant Design for Generic Anatomical Reconstruction: An In Silico Framework for Material Selection and Biomechanical Validation.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Narrative review: a multidisciplinary approach to chest wall reconstruction.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Design of a Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Splint for Surgical Correction of Pectus Excavatum in a Kitten.Case reports in veterinary medicine · 2026Article
- Chest wall stabilization following hemi-sternectomy assisted by 3D printed model.Case reports in plastic surgery & hand surgery · 2026Article
- Interdisciplinary Collaborative Virtual Reality Planning for Chest Wall Resection and Reconstruction for Sarcoma and Other Large Chest Wall Malignancies Enhanced by Automated AI Segmentation: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis.Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Technology is advancing fast, and chest wall surgery finds particular benefit in the broader availability of three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction and printing. An increasing number of reports are being published on the use of these resources in virtual 3D reconstructions of chest walls in computed tomography (CT) scans, virtual surgeries, 3D printing of real-size models for surgical planning, practice, and education, and of note, the manufacture of customized 3D printed implants, changing the fundamental conception from a surgery that fits all, to a surgery for each patient. In this review, we explore the evidence published on simple chest wall reconstruction, including the use of 3D technology to assist in the improvement of the repair of the most frequent chest wall deformities: pectus excavatum and carinatum. Current studies are oriented to the automatization and customization of transthoracic implants, as well as education on real-size models. Next, we investigate the implementation of 3D printing in the repair of complex chest wall reconstruction, comprised of infrequent chest wall deformities such as pectus arcuatum and Poland syndrome. These malformations are very heterogeneous resulting in a high degree of improvisation during the surgical repair. In this setting, 3D technology plays a role in the standardization of a process that contemplates customization, concepts that may seem contradictory. Finally, 3D printing with biocompatible materials is rapidly becoming the first choice for the reconstruction of wide chest wall oncological resections. In this work, we review the first and most important current publications on the subject.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.